1950 Allard K2 vs. 2005 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2005 Toyota Tundra is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,950 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota Tundra (245 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 160 more horse power than 1950 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1950 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 696 kg more than 1950 Allard K2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Allard K2 | 2005 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Allard | Toyota |
Model | K2 | Tundra |
Year Released | 1950 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 3950 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 245 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1891 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 5550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 3270 mm |