1950 Allard K2 vs. 2006 Nissan 350Z
To start off, 2006 Nissan 350Z is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Nissan 350Z (300 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 215 more horse power than 1950 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Nissan 350Z should accelerate faster than 1950 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Nissan 350Z weights approximately 515 kg more than 1950 Allard K2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Allard K2 | 2006 Nissan 350Z | |
| Make | Allard | Nissan |
| Model | K2 | 350Z |
| Year Released | 1950 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 3491 cc |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 300 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1710 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4320 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2660 mm |
