1950 Allard K2 vs. 2008 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2008 Holden Commodore is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Holden Commodore (240 HP) has 155 more horse power than 1950 Allard K2. (85 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1950 Allard K2.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Allard K2 | 2008 Holden Commodore | |
Make | Allard | Holden |
Model | K2 | Commodore |
Year Released | 1950 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 2564 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 240 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |