1950 Allard K2 vs. 2009 Dodge Challenger
To start off, 2009 Dodge Challenger is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Dodge Challenger (247 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 162 more horse power than 1950 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Challenger should accelerate faster than 1950 Allard K2.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Dodge Challenger has automatic transmission and 1950 Allard K2 has manual transmission. 1950 Allard K2 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Dodge Challenger will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Allard K2 | 2009 Dodge Challenger | |
Make | Allard | Dodge |
Model | K2 | Challenger |
Year Released | 1950 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 3518 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 247 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 5030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2950 mm |