1950 Allard K2 vs. 2009 Kia Cee'd
To start off, 2009 Kia Cee'd is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Kia Cee'd (113 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 1950 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Kia Cee'd should accelerate faster than 1950 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Kia Cee'd weights approximately 172 kg more than 1950 Allard K2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1950 Allard K2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Allard K2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Kia Cee'd, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Allard K2 | 2009 Kia Cee'd | |
Make | Allard | Kia |
Model | K2 | Cee'd |
Year Released | 1950 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 1582 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 113 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1367 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4240 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2660 mm |