1950 Allard K2 vs. 2010 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Allard K2 would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chevrolet Camaro (426 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 341 more horse power than 1950 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1950 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 556 kg more than 1950 Allard K2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Allard K2 | 2010 Chevrolet Camaro | |
| Make | Allard | Chevrolet |
| Model | K2 | Camaro |
| Year Released | 1950 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 6200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 426 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5900 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1751 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4836 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1918 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1377 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2852 mm |
