1950 Allard K2 vs. 2011 Nissan Juke
To start off, 2011 Nissan Juke is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Nissan Juke (188 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 103 more horse power than 1950 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Juke should accelerate faster than 1950 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Nissan Juke weights approximately 147 kg more than 1950 Allard K2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2011 Nissan Juke is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1950 Allard K2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Juke will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Allard K2 | 2011 Nissan Juke | |
Make | Allard | Nissan |
Model | K2 | Juke |
Year Released | 1950 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 188 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1342 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4125 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2530 mm |