1950 Allard K2 vs. 2013 Jaguar XK
To start off, 2013 Jaguar XK is newer by 63 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Allard K2 would be higher. At 5,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jaguar XK (380 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 295 more horse power than 1950 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1950 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jaguar XK weights approximately 515 kg more than 1950 Allard K2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Allard K2 | 2013 Jaguar XK | |
| Make | Allard | Jaguar |
| Model | K2 | XK |
| Year Released | 1950 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 5000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 380 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1710 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4794 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 2032 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1322 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2752 mm |
