1950 Alvis TA 14 vs. 2010 Mazda 2
To start off, 2010 Mazda 2 is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Alvis TA 14. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Alvis TA 14 would be higher. At 1,892 cc (4 cylinders), 1950 Alvis TA 14 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda 2 (74 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1950 Alvis TA 14. (64 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 2 should accelerate faster than 1950 Alvis TA 14. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Alvis TA 14 weights approximately 295 kg more than 2010 Mazda 2.
Because 1950 Alvis TA 14 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Alvis TA 14. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Alvis TA 14 | 2010 Mazda 2 | |
| Make | Alvis | Mazda |
| Model | TA 14 | 2 |
| Year Released | 1950 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1892 cc | 1242 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1420 kg | 1125 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 3930 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1690 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2500 mm |
