1950 Alvis TB 14 vs. 1968 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1968 Mazda Cosmo is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Alvis TB 14. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Alvis TB 14 would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1968 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Mazda Cosmo (94 HP) has 27 more horse power than 1950 Alvis TB 14. (67 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1950 Alvis TB 14. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Alvis TB 14 weights approximately 575 kg more than 1968 Mazda Cosmo.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Alvis TB 14 | 1968 Mazda Cosmo | |
| Make | Alvis | Mazda |
| Model | TB 14 | Cosmo |
| Year Released | 1950 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1892 cc | 1964 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 67 HP | 94 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Top Speed | 129 km/hour | 200 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1515 kg | 940 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1170 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2210 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 57 L |
