1950 Alvis TB 14 vs. 1983 Cadillac Cimarron
To start off, 1983 Cadillac Cimarron is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Alvis TB 14. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Alvis TB 14 would be higher. At 2,843 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Cadillac Cimarron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Cadillac Cimarron (123 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 1950 Alvis TB 14. (67 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Cadillac Cimarron should accelerate faster than 1950 Alvis TB 14. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Alvis TB 14 weights approximately 365 kg more than 1983 Cadillac Cimarron.
Because 1950 Alvis TB 14 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Alvis TB 14. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Cadillac Cimarron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Alvis TB 14 | 1983 Cadillac Cimarron | |
Make | Alvis | Cadillac |
Model | TB 14 | Cimarron |
Year Released | 1950 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1892 cc | 2843 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1515 kg | 1150 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2580 mm |