1950 Alvis TB 14 vs. 2000 Citroen Xsara
To start off, 2000 Citroen Xsara is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Alvis TB 14. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Alvis TB 14 would be higher. At 1,892 cc (4 cylinders), 1950 Alvis TB 14 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Citroen Xsara (108 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1950 Alvis TB 14. (67 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Citroen Xsara should accelerate faster than 1950 Alvis TB 14. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Alvis TB 14 weights approximately 381 kg more than 2000 Citroen Xsara.
Because 1950 Alvis TB 14 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Alvis TB 14. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Citroen Xsara, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Alvis TB 14 | 2000 Citroen Xsara | |
Make | Alvis | Citroen |
Model | TB 14 | Xsara |
Year Released | 1950 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1892 cc | 1586 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 74 mm | 78.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 110 mm | 82 mm |
Top Speed | 129 km/hour | 197 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1515 kg | 1134 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4190 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2550 mm |