1950 Alvis TB 14 vs. 2004 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Alvis TB 14. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Alvis TB 14 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (260 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 193 more horse power than 1950 Alvis TB 14. (67 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1950 Alvis TB 14. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Mustang weights approximately 3 kg more than 1950 Alvis TB 14. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Alvis TB 14 | 2004 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Alvis | Ford |
Model | TB 14 | Mustang |
Year Released | 1950 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1892 cc | 4605 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 260 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 74 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 110 mm | 90 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1515 kg | 1518 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 59 L |