1950 Alvis TB 14 vs. 2004 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2004 MCC Crossblade is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Alvis TB 14. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Alvis TB 14 would be higher. At 1,892 cc (4 cylinders), 1950 Alvis TB 14 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 MCC Crossblade (70 HP) has 3 more horse power than 1950 Alvis TB 14. (67 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 MCC Crossblade should accelerate faster than 1950 Alvis TB 14. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Alvis TB 14 weights approximately 775 kg more than 2004 MCC Crossblade.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Alvis TB 14 | 2004 MCC Crossblade | |
| Make | Alvis | MCC |
| Model | TB 14 | Crossblade |
| Year Released | 1950 | 2004 |
| Engine Size | 1892 cc | 599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 67 HP | 70 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1515 kg | 740 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 2630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 1810 mm |
