1950 Alvis TB 14 vs. 2006 Citroen C2
To start off, 2006 Citroen C2 is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Alvis TB 14. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Alvis TB 14 would be higher. At 1,892 cc (4 cylinders), 1950 Alvis TB 14 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 67 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Alvis TB 14 weights approximately 520 kg more than 2006 Citroen C2.
Because 1950 Alvis TB 14 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Alvis TB 14. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Citroen C2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Alvis TB 14 | 2006 Citroen C2 | |
Make | Alvis | Citroen |
Model | TB 14 | C2 |
Year Released | 1950 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1892 cc | 1398 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 67 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 74 mm | 73.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 110 mm | 82 mm |
Top Speed | 129 km/hour | 166 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1515 kg | 995 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 3670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2320 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 41 L |