1950 Alvis TB 14 vs. 2006 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2006 Ford Mustang is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Alvis TB 14. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Alvis TB 14 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Mustang (300 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 233 more horse power than 1950 Alvis TB 14. (67 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1950 Alvis TB 14. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Alvis TB 14 weights approximately 37 kg more than 2006 Ford Mustang.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Alvis TB 14 | 2006 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Alvis | Ford |
| Model | TB 14 | Mustang |
| Year Released | 1950 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1892 cc | 4605 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 67 HP | 300 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5750 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 74 mm | 90.2 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 110 mm | 90 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1515 kg | 1478 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1890 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2730 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 61 L |
