1950 Alvis TB 14 vs. 2008 Rover 75
To start off, 2008 Rover 75 is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Alvis TB 14. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Alvis TB 14 would be higher. At 2,497 cc, 2008 Rover 75 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Rover 75 weights approximately 20 kg more than 1950 Alvis TB 14.
Because 1950 Alvis TB 14 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Alvis TB 14. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Rover 75, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Alvis TB 14 | 2008 Rover 75 | |
Make | Alvis | Rover |
Model | TB 14 | 75 |
Year Released | 1950 | 2008 |
Engine Size | 1892 cc | 2497 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 0 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 74 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 110 mm | 82.8 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 129 km/hour | 220 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1515 kg | 1535 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 65 L |