1950 Alvis TB 14 vs. 2010 Acura CSX
To start off, 2010 Acura CSX is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Alvis TB 14. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Alvis TB 14 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Acura CSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Acura CSX (155 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 88 more horse power than 1950 Alvis TB 14. (67 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Acura CSX should accelerate faster than 1950 Alvis TB 14. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Alvis TB 14 weights approximately 202 kg more than 2010 Acura CSX.
Because 1950 Alvis TB 14 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Alvis TB 14. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Acura CSX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Alvis TB 14 | 2010 Acura CSX | |
Make | Alvis | Acura |
Model | TB 14 | CSX |
Year Released | 1950 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1892 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 155 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1515 kg | 1313 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4544 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1752 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1435 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2700 mm |