1950 Austin A 40 vs. 1952 Nissan Sedan
To start off, 1952 Nissan Sedan is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,200 cc (4 cylinders), 1950 Austin A 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1950 Austin A 40 (38 HP @ 4300 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1952 Nissan Sedan. (18 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1950 Austin A 40 should accelerate faster than 1952 Nissan Sedan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Austin A 40 weights approximately 180 kg more than 1952 Nissan Sedan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Austin A 40 | 1952 Nissan Sedan | |
| Make | Austin | Nissan |
| Model | A 40 | Sedan |
| Year Released | 1950 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1200 cc | 860 cc |
| Horse Power | 38 HP | 18 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 790 kg |
