1950 Austin A 40 vs. 1954 Pontiac Star Chief
To start off, 1954 Pontiac Star Chief is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 4,715 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Pontiac Star Chief is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Pontiac Star Chief (173 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 135 more horse power than 1950 Austin A 40. (38 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1954 Pontiac Star Chief should accelerate faster than 1950 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Pontiac Star Chief weights approximately 680 kg more than 1950 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Austin A 40 | 1954 Pontiac Star Chief | |
Make | Austin | Pontiac |
Model | A 40 | Star Chief |
Year Released | 1950 | 1954 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1200 cc | 4715 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 173 HP |
Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 1650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 5160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 3110 mm |