1950 Austin A 40 vs. 1956 DKW Universal
To start off, 1956 DKW Universal is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,200 cc (4 cylinders), 1950 Austin A 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Austin A 40 weights approximately 41 kg more than 1956 DKW Universal.
Because 1950 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1956 DKW Universal, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Austin A 40 | 1956 DKW Universal | |
| Make | Austin | DKW |
| Model | A 40 | Universal |
| Year Released | 1950 | 1956 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1200 cc | 894 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 49 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 925 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4130 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1530 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2460 mm |
