1950 Austin A 40 vs. 1962 Renault 8
To start off, 1962 Renault 8 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,198 cc (4 cylinders), 1950 Austin A 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1950 Austin A 40 (49 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1962 Renault 8. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1950 Austin A 40 should accelerate faster than 1962 Renault 8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Austin A 40 weights approximately 250 kg more than 1962 Renault 8. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Austin A 40 | 1962 Renault 8 | |
| Make | Austin | Renault |
| Model | A 40 | 8 |
| Year Released | 1950 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1198 cc | 956 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 49 HP | 47 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 990 kg | 740 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1500 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2280 mm |
