1950 Austin A 40 vs. 1964 Cadillac Eldorado
To start off, 1964 Cadillac Eldorado is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac Eldorado (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 159 more horse power than 1950 Austin A 40. (49 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac Eldorado should accelerate faster than 1950 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac Eldorado weights approximately 1124 kg more than 1950 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Austin A 40 | 1964 Cadillac Eldorado | |
| Make | Austin | Cadillac |
| Model | A 40 | Eldorado |
| Year Released | 1950 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1200 cc | 7029 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 49 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 2090 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 5690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 3300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 75 L |
