1950 Austin A 40 vs. 1970 Cadillac Calais
To start off, 1970 Cadillac Calais is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1970 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Cadillac Calais (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 190 more horse power than 1950 Austin A 40. (38 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1970 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 1950 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 1106 kg more than 1950 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Austin A 40 | 1970 Cadillac Calais | |
Make | Austin | Cadillac |
Model | A 40 | Calais |
Year Released | 1950 | 1970 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1200 cc | 7734 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 228 HP |
Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 2076 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 5730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 3300 mm |