1950 Austin A 40 vs. 1982 Buick Century
To start off, 1982 Buick Century is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Buick Century is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Buick Century (90 HP) has 41 more horse power than 1950 Austin A 40. (49 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Buick Century should accelerate faster than 1950 Austin A 40.
Because 1950 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Buick Century, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Austin A 40 | 1982 Buick Century | |
Make | Austin | Buick |
Model | A 40 | Century |
Year Released | 1950 | 1982 |
Body Type | Convertible | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1198 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 90 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4849 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1763 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1374 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2664 mm |