1950 Austin A 40 vs. 1992 Mahindra Armada
To start off, 1992 Mahindra Armada is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Mahindra Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Mahindra Armada (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1950 Austin A 40. (49 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Mahindra Armada should accelerate faster than 1950 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Mahindra Armada weights approximately 1010 kg more than 1950 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1992 Mahindra Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1950 Austin A 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Mahindra Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Austin A 40 | 1992 Mahindra Armada | |
Make | Austin | Mahindra |
Model | A 40 | Armada |
Year Released | 1950 | 1992 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1198 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 990 kg | 2000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4310 mm |