1950 Austin A 40 vs. 1996 Mahindra Armada
To start off, 1996 Mahindra Armada is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 2,299 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Mahindra Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mahindra Armada (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1950 Austin A 40. (49 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mahindra Armada should accelerate faster than 1950 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mahindra Armada weights approximately 1034 kg more than 1950 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1996 Mahindra Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1950 Austin A 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mahindra Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Austin A 40 | 1996 Mahindra Armada | |
| Make | Austin | Mahindra |
| Model | A 40 | Armada |
| Year Released | 1950 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1200 cc | 2299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 49 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 2000 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4310 mm |
