1950 Austin A 40 vs. 2002 Saturn SC
To start off, 2002 Saturn SC is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,901 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Saturn SC is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1950 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Saturn SC, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Austin A 40 | 2002 Saturn SC | |
Make | Austin | Saturn |
Model | A 40 | SC |
Year Released | 1950 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1200 cc | 1901 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |