1950 Austin A 40 vs. 2003 MCC Smart
To start off, 2003 MCC Smart is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,200 cc (4 cylinders), 1950 Austin A 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 MCC Smart (73 HP) has 35 more horse power than 1950 Austin A 40. (38 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 MCC Smart should accelerate faster than 1950 Austin A 40.
Because 1950 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 MCC Smart, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 MCC Smart (100 Nm) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 1950 Austin A 40. (80 Nm). This means 2003 MCC Smart will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1950 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Austin A 40 | 2003 MCC Smart | |
Make | Austin | MCC |
Model | A 40 | Smart |
Year Released | 1950 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1200 cc | 1124 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 73 HP |
Torque | 80 Nm | 100 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 65.5 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 89 mm | 84.8 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 970 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 3760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 48 L | 47 L |