1950 Austin A 40 vs. 2011 Aston Martin Cygnet
To start off, 2011 Aston Martin Cygnet is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Aston Martin Cygnet is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Aston Martin Cygnet (99 HP) has 61 more horse power than 1950 Austin A 40. (38 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Aston Martin Cygnet should accelerate faster than 1950 Austin A 40.
Because 1950 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Aston Martin Cygnet, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Austin A 40 | 2011 Aston Martin Cygnet | |
Make | Austin | Aston Martin |
Model | A 40 | Cygnet |
Year Released | 1950 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1200 cc | 1300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 99 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |