1950 Austin A 40 vs. 2012 Lancia Ypsilon
To start off, 2012 Lancia Ypsilon is newer by 62 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,242 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Lancia Ypsilon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Lancia Ypsilon (68 HP) has 19 more horse power than 1950 Austin A 40. (49 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Lancia Ypsilon should accelerate faster than 1950 Austin A 40.
Because 1950 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Lancia Ypsilon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Austin A 40 | 2012 Lancia Ypsilon | |
Make | Austin | Lancia |
Model | A 40 | Ypsilon |
Year Released | 1950 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1200 cc | 1242 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 68 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 3840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2390 mm |