1950 Austin A 70 vs. 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford
To start off, 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Austin A 70. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Austin A 70 would be higher. At 2,443 cc (4 cylinders), 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 1950 Austin A 70. (66 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford should accelerate faster than 1950 Austin A 70. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford weights approximately 190 kg more than 1950 Austin A 70. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford (184 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 1950 Austin A 70. (158 Nm @ 1700 RPM). This means 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1950 Austin A 70.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Austin A 70 | 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford | |
| Make | Austin | Austin-Healey |
| Model | A 70 | Tickford |
| Year Released | 1950 | 1955 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2199 cc | 2443 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 66 HP | 105 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 158 Nm | 184 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1700 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1340 kg | 1530 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4260 mm | 4500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2600 mm |
