1950 Austin A 70 vs. 1969 Dodge Challenger
To start off, 1969 Dodge Challenger is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Austin A 70. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Austin A 70 would be higher. At 5,562 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Dodge Challenger (235 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 172 more horse power than 1950 Austin A 70. (63 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Dodge Challenger should accelerate faster than 1950 Austin A 70. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Dodge Challenger weights approximately 205 kg more than 1950 Austin A 70. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Austin A 70 | 1969 Dodge Challenger | |
Make | Austin | Dodge |
Model | A 70 | Challenger |
Year Released | 1950 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2200 cc | 5562 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 235 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 1475 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2800 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 68 L |