1950 Austin A 70 vs. 1974 Renault Siete
To start off, 1974 Renault Siete is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Austin A 70. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Austin A 70 would be higher. At 2,200 cc (4 cylinders), 1950 Austin A 70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1950 Austin A 70 (63 HP) has 19 more horse power than 1974 Renault Siete. (44 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1950 Austin A 70 should accelerate faster than 1974 Renault Siete. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Austin A 70 weights approximately 455 kg more than 1974 Renault Siete. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1950 Austin A 70 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Austin A 70. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1974 Renault Siete, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Austin A 70 | 1974 Renault Siete | |
Make | Austin | Renault |
Model | A 70 | Siete |
Year Released | 1950 | 1974 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2200 cc | 1108 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 44 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 79.4 mm | 70 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 111.1 mm | 72 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 815 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 3900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2540 mm |