1950 Austin A 70 vs. 1983 Toyota Corona
To start off, 1983 Toyota Corona is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Austin A 70. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Austin A 70 would be higher. At 2,366 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Toyota Corona is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Toyota Corona (116 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 1950 Austin A 70. (63 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Toyota Corona should accelerate faster than 1950 Austin A 70. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Austin A 70 weights approximately 135 kg more than 1983 Toyota Corona.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1983 Toyota Corona has automatic transmission and 1950 Austin A 70 has manual transmission. 1950 Austin A 70 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1983 Toyota Corona will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Austin A 70 | 1983 Toyota Corona | |
Make | Austin | Toyota |
Model | A 70 | Corona |
Year Released | 1950 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2200 cc | 2366 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 116 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 1135 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2510 mm |