1950 Austin A 70 vs. 2000 Smart Roadster
To start off, 2000 Smart Roadster is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Austin A 70. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Austin A 70 would be higher. At 2,200 cc (4 cylinders), 1950 Austin A 70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Smart Roadster (101 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1950 Austin A 70. (63 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Smart Roadster should accelerate faster than 1950 Austin A 70.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Austin A 70 | 2000 Smart Roadster | |
Make | Austin | Smart |
Model | A 70 | Roadster |
Year Released | 1950 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 2200 cc | 698 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 101 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 79.4 mm | 66.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 111.1 mm | 67 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 3430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1200 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2370 mm |