1950 Austin A 70 vs. 2002 Lada Samara II
To start off, 2002 Lada Samara II is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Austin A 70. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Austin A 70 would be higher. At 2,200 cc (4 cylinders), 1950 Austin A 70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Lada Samara II (67 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1950 Austin A 70. (63 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Lada Samara II should accelerate faster than 1950 Austin A 70. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Austin A 70 weights approximately 300 kg more than 2002 Lada Samara II.
Because 1950 Austin A 70 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Austin A 70. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Lada Samara II, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Austin A 70 | 2002 Lada Samara II | |
Make | Austin | Lada |
Model | A 70 | Samara II |
Year Released | 1950 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2200 cc | 1499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 67 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 970 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2470 mm |