1950 Austin A 70 vs. 2003 Lancia Zeta
To start off, 2003 Lancia Zeta is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Austin A 70. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Austin A 70 would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1950 Austin A 70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Lancia Zeta (134 HP) has 68 more horse power than 1950 Austin A 70. (66 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Lancia Zeta should accelerate faster than 1950 Austin A 70. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Lancia Zeta weights approximately 262 kg more than 1950 Austin A 70. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1950 Austin A 70 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Austin A 70. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Lancia Zeta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Lancia Zeta (190 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 1950 Austin A 70. (158 Nm @ 1700 RPM). This means 2003 Lancia Zeta will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1950 Austin A 70. 2003 Lancia Zeta has automatic transmission and 1950 Austin A 70 has manual transmission. 1950 Austin A 70 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Lancia Zeta will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Austin A 70 | 2003 Lancia Zeta | |
| Make | Austin | Lancia |
| Model | A 70 | Zeta |
| Year Released | 1950 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2199 cc | 1910 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 66 HP | 134 HP |
| Torque | 158 Nm | 190 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1700 RPM | 4100 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 79.4 mm | 85 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 111.1 mm | 88 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1340 kg | 1602 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4260 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1720 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2830 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 56 L | 80 L |
