1950 Austin A 70 vs. 2005 Kia K2700
To start off, 2005 Kia K2700 is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Austin A 70. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Austin A 70 would be higher. At 2,665 cc, 2005 Kia K2700 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Kia K2700 (83 HP @ 4150 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1950 Austin A 70. (63 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Kia K2700 should accelerate faster than 1950 Austin A 70. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Kia K2700 weights approximately 260 kg more than 1950 Austin A 70. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Austin A 70 | 2005 Kia K2700 | |
| Make | Austin | Kia |
| Model | A 70 | K2700 |
| Year Released | 1950 | 2005 |
| Engine Size | 2200 cc | 2665 cc |
| Horse Power | 63 HP | 83 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4150 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 79.4 mm | 94.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 111.1 mm | 95 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 1530 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2380 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 60 L |
