1950 Austin A 70 vs. 2006 Renault Kangoo
To start off, 2006 Renault Kangoo is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Austin A 70. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Austin A 70 would be higher. At 2,200 cc (4 cylinders), 1950 Austin A 70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Renault Kangoo (64 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1950 Austin A 70. (63 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Renault Kangoo should accelerate faster than 1950 Austin A 70.
Because 1950 Austin A 70 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Austin A 70. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Renault Kangoo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Austin A 70 | 2006 Renault Kangoo | |
Make | Austin | Renault |
Model | A 70 | Kangoo |
Year Released | 1950 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2200 cc | 1461 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 64 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 79.4 mm | 79.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 111.1 mm | 70 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 50 L |