1950 Austin A 70 vs. 2006 Toyota MR2
To start off, 2006 Toyota MR2 is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Austin A 70. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Austin A 70 would be higher. At 2,200 cc (4 cylinders), 1950 Austin A 70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Toyota MR2 (140 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 1950 Austin A 70. (63 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Toyota MR2 should accelerate faster than 1950 Austin A 70.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Austin A 70 | 2006 Toyota MR2 | |
Make | Austin | Toyota |
Model | A 70 | MR2 |
Year Released | 1950 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2200 cc | 1799 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 140 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1250 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2460 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 60 L |