1950 Austin A 70 vs. 2008 Jeep Cherokee
To start off, 2008 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Austin A 70. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Austin A 70 would be higher. At 2,776 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 679 kg more than 1950 Austin A 70.
Because 2008 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1950 Austin A 70. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2008 Jeep Cherokee has automatic transmission and 1950 Austin A 70 has manual transmission. 1950 Austin A 70 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Jeep Cherokee will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Austin A 70 | 2008 Jeep Cherokee | |
Make | Austin | Jeep |
Model | A 70 | Cherokee |
Year Released | 1950 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2200 cc | 2776 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 0 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 79.4 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 111.1 mm | 100 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 1949 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 78 L |