1950 Austin A 70 vs. 2009 Nissan 350Z
To start off, 2009 Nissan 350Z is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Austin A 70. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Austin A 70 would be higher. At 3,498 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Nissan 350Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan 350Z (309 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 246 more horse power than 1950 Austin A 70. (63 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan 350Z should accelerate faster than 1950 Austin A 70.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Austin A 70 | 2009 Nissan 350Z | |
Make | Austin | Nissan |
Model | A 70 | 350Z |
Year Released | 1950 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2200 cc | 3498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 309 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 79.4 mm | 95.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 111.1 mm | 81.4 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1340 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 80 L |