1950 Austin A 70 vs. 2010 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac CTS is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Austin A 70. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Austin A 70 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac CTS (270 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 207 more horse power than 1950 Austin A 70. (63 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1950 Austin A 70. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 486 kg more than 1950 Austin A 70. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Austin A 70 | 2010 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Austin | Cadillac |
| Model | A 70 | CTS |
| Year Released | 1950 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2200 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 63 HP | 270 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 1756 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4867 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1504 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2880 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 68 L |
