1950 Austin A 90 vs. 1967 Bizzarrini A3C
To start off, 1967 Bizzarrini A3C is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Austin A 90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Austin A 90 would be higher. At 5,354 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Bizzarrini A3C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Bizzarrini A3C (361 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 273 more horse power than 1950 Austin A 90. (88 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Bizzarrini A3C should accelerate faster than 1950 Austin A 90. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Austin A 90 weights approximately 100 kg more than 1967 Bizzarrini A3C.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Bizzarrini A3C (510 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 319 more torque (in Nm) than 1950 Austin A 90. (191 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1967 Bizzarrini A3C will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1950 Austin A 90.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Austin A 90 | 1967 Bizzarrini A3C | |
Make | Austin | Bizzarrini |
Model | A 90 | A3C |
Year Released | 1950 | 1967 |
Engine Size | 2660 cc | 5354 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 88 HP | 361 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 191 Nm | 510 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1360 kg | 1260 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2460 mm |