1950 Austin A 90 vs. 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Austin A 90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Austin A 90 would be higher. At 2,660 cc (4 cylinders), 1950 Austin A 90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander (163 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 1950 Austin A 90. (88 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander should accelerate faster than 1950 Austin A 90. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander weights approximately 150 kg more than 1950 Austin A 90. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander (213 Nm) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 1950 Austin A 90. (191 Nm). This means 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1950 Austin A 90.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Austin A 90 | 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander | |
Make | Austin | Mitsubishi |
Model | A 90 | Outlander |
Year Released | 1950 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2660 cc | 2376 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 88 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 191 Nm | 213 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87.3 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 111.1 mm | 100 mm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1360 kg | 1510 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 59 L |