1950 Austin A135 vs. 1959 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1959 Cadillac 62 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Austin A135. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Austin A135 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 1950 Austin A135. (124 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1950 Austin A135. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 105 kg more than 1950 Austin A135. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Austin A135 | 1959 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | Austin | Cadillac |
Model | A135 | 62 |
Year Released | 1950 | 1959 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3993 cc | 6382 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 124 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2020 kg | 2125 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 5730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 2040 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 3310 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 79 L |