1950 Austin A135 vs. 1969 Chevrolet Impala
To start off, 1969 Chevrolet Impala is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Austin A135. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Austin A135 would be higher. At 7,442 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Chevrolet Impala weights approximately 45 kg more than 1950 Austin A135.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Austin A135 | 1969 Chevrolet Impala | |
Make | Austin | Chevrolet |
Model | A135 | Impala |
Year Released | 1950 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3993 cc | 7442 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 124 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2020 kg | 2065 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 5600 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 3100 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 76 L |