1950 Austin A135 vs. 1978 Chevrolet El Camino
To start off, 1978 Chevrolet El Camino is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Austin A135. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Austin A135 would be higher. In terms of performance, 1978 Chevrolet El Camino (350 HP) has 226 more horse power than 1950 Austin A135. (124 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1978 Chevrolet El Camino should accelerate faster than 1950 Austin A135.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Austin A135 | 1978 Chevrolet El Camino | |
Make | Austin | Chevrolet |
Model | A135 | El Camino |
Year Released | 1950 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 124 HP | 350 HP |
Engine Compression Ratio | 6.8:1 | 11.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 5130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2980 mm |