1950 Austin A135 vs. 1983 Ford Ranger
To start off, 1983 Ford Ranger is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Austin A135. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Austin A135 would be higher. At 3,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1950 Austin A135 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Ford Ranger (145 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 1950 Austin A135. (124 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1950 Austin A135.
Because 1983 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1950 Austin A135. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Austin A135 | 1983 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Austin | Ford |
| Model | A135 | Ranger |
| Year Released | 1950 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3993 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 124 HP | 145 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4690 mm |
